Ihsan Alkhatib

I was interviewed by a local paper regarding the killing of Iranian General Suleimani. Below are their questions and my answers. I haven’t seen the paper yet. 1. What was your first reaction when you heard the news of the airstrike yesterday? I wasn’t surprised. President Trump had been very patient with Iranian provocations. He is not trigger happy as some of his detractors think. He clearly warned the Iranians that if they kill Americans, they will face a heavy retaliation. They kept on attacking American targets through proxies. After the attack that injured and killed Americans, he decided to kill General Suleimani, a man who has been involved in the death of hundreds of Americans. As to his foreign policy, President Trump deserves more credit than he is given. 2. What is your opinion of the air strikes that resulted in the death of the Iranian general?  The Iranians forced America’s hands. There were a number of provocations. The last was attacking the American embassy i

Part 1 of 2: This month I interviewed Imad Hamad, the Executive Director of the American Human Right Council (AHRC), a veteran community leader and activist, with questions about the challenges facing the Arab and Muslim American community. The achievements as well as the challenges. Below are edited excerpts:   -What are your thoughts as to the Arab and Muslim American community, especially in Michigan? The community should be proud of its achievements. It is heavily engaged in all avenues of life in Michigan. It is an important community socially, economically and politically. We have a large number of successful business people, attorneys, medical doctors, pharmacists, engineers, educators, etc.   The list is long. Name it we have it. Politically, we are represented in government and on the bench. It is an impressive steady progress. Very promising future ahead indeed. However, this is not a free of challenges journey and success. -What has been an

The Trump administration’s approach is grounded in the history of the US- Iran relationship and the importance of Saudi Arabia. Mr. Trump grounds the understanding of Iran in the context of the relationship since the Ayatollah’s revolution. That context involves violating the Tehran embassy, blowing up the Beirut embassy and marine barracks, holding diplomats hostage, kidnapping Americans through proxies for weapons and other acts of violence. As former Secretary of State Tillerson told Iranian Minister Jawad Zarif, Iran has been killing Americans and getting away with it. Not anymore. Second, missing from your analysis is Saudi Arabia. While many Democrats are willing to abandon the Kingdom under the pretext of human rights violations as Obama did, Mr. Trump considers Saudi Arabia a vital ally whom the US will not abandon. Iran has presence or influence in Syria, Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen.  Only Saudi intervention saved Bahrain from Iran’s proxies. Mr. Trump is responsive t

Democrats are not happy with the picture above. Trump shaking MBS’s hand. It’s the Kashoggi issue and other human rights matters. Had President Trump been shaking Iran’s Foreign Minister Zarif’s hand, they would have cheered. Because as we know, Iran’s human rights is second to none. The human rights issue is only an issue as to US relations with Saudi Arabia. Not an issue for Obama negotiating the nuclear deal. Not an issue for the Democrats cheer leading for the deal. Have the Democrats heard of the Iranian Baha’i that is singled out for state persecution in Iran?

Here we go again. This is Iraq all over again. Not even close. The US was on a path for war with Iraq before George W. Bush. And there was a strong American constituency on board and pushing for the war. The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 basically set America’s policy on Iraq as regime change. The summary, without quotes: Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 - Declares that it should be the policy of the United States to seek to remove the Saddam Hussein regime from power in Iraq and to replace it with a democratic government. Authorizes the President, after notifying specified congressional committees, to provide to the Iraqi democratic opposition organizations: (1) grant assistance for radio and television broadcasting to Iraq; (2) Department of Defense (DOD) defense articles and services and military education and training (IMET); and (3) humanitarian assistance, with emphasis on addressing the needs of individuals who have fled from areas under the control of t

al Aqsa, Jerusalem El Bireh, Palestine The Apartheid Wall The occupation Ramallah, Palestine Mar Elias camp, Beirut Mar Elias camp, Beirut Mar Elias camp, Beirut The Trump administration has a deal for the Palestinians: improving economic lot in return for giving up national aspirations. This is the so-called Deal of the Century. No one except Trump and a small circle of advisers know the contents of this deal. The key is that this scheme aims to put an end to the Palestinian struggle. Economics is not the reason that the Palestinians have, for about a 100 years, been making immense sacrifices in life and treasure.  But if neither Hamas nor the PA agrees to this so called deal, is it going anywhere? Not everything is for sale. More than 2,000 years ago, a Palestinian said “ Man shall not live on bread alone .” And as a Palestinian woman from Ramallah, Deema Mimi, told Felicia Schwartz of The Wall Street Journal: