The Federal Southern District Court of New York: Iran shares responsibility for the 9/11 attacks

-



Southern District Court of New York





The Federal Southern District Court of New York: Iran shares responsibility for the 9/11 attacks
Court holds Iran and Hizbullah provided material support to al Qaeda
Case based on expert testimony, Iran does not participate*

The Arab media reported that an American court held Iran responsible, along with al Qaeda, for the 9/11 attacks.  There is a large number of civil cases filed by American citizens against Iran seeking damages for acts of terrorism around the world. Iran, for example, was held liable for the kidnapping and killing of American citizens in Beirut in the 1980s and ordered it to pay millions of dollars to the families of the victims and to the former prisoners. One of these victims is the former AP reporter Terry Anderson who, according to the Court, was held by a Hizbullah front group, Islamic Jihad, for 7 years in the 1980s. Anderson was paid about 6 million dollars from Iranian assets as compensation for this imprisonment. He wrote a book, Den of Lions: A Startling Memoir of Survival and Triumph about his experience. Another of the hostages, Reverend Terry Waite also wrote a memoir, Taken on Trust, about his years of captivity and also accused Hizbullah, Iran and the late Hizbullah top operational man, Imad Moghnieh, of being behind his ordeal.

Countries or states as they are referred to in international law, have sovereign immunity.  How is anyone able to sue a sovereign country? What did the Court find Iran liable for? What is the evidence? A case from the Southern District of New York, Havlish v. Bin Laden, et al. answered these questions.  Iran did not participate in the proceedings.  The judge decided the case mainly on expert testimony.

 Below are excerpts from the case. The questions are mine and the answer is an excerpt from the Court’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law.

*How does an American court have jurisdiction over Iran, a sovereign country?
Pg. 3, #1: The court’s jurisdiction over Iran and the agency instrumentality Defendants is grounded in the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA”), 28 U.S.C. 1602, et seq. Section 1605A of the FSIA also serves as the basis for liability claims asserted by plaintiffs who are United States nationals.

*We see much Sunni-Shiite tensions in the world today.  Why and how did the Court find that Iran was working with Sunni terrorists who are known as anti- Shiite?
Pg. 16, #2: In the early 1990s, casting aside the historic bitterness between the Sunni and Shi’a sects of Islam, Sudanese religious-political leader Hassan al Turabi and Iran’s political leaderships and intelligence connections, beginning a united Sunni-Shiite front against the United States and the West. Ex. 6, Lopwz-Tefft Affid. 132-33; Ex. 2, Timmerman 2nd Affid. 48.

*The controversial Sunni Islamist leader Hassan al Turabi, who passed away recently, was fingered by the Court. What role did he play in bringing Iran and Sunni terrorists together?
Pg. 16, #2: While Osama bin Laden and al Qaeda were headquartered in Sudan in the early 1990s, Hassan al Turabi fostered the creation of a foundation and alliance for combined Sunni and Shi’a opposition to the United States and the West, an effort that was agreed to and joined by Osama bin Laden and Ayman al Zawahiri, leaders of al Qaeda , and by the leadership of Iran.  9/11 REPORT, pp. 60-61; Ex. 6, Lopez-Tefft Affid. 132; Ex. 3, Byman Affid. 23; see also 18-22, 24-28.

*The Court claimed that Iran provided much material support for al Qaeda, support without which the Court held it would have been harder for al Qaeda to attack the US on 9/11 and kill three thousand Americans. What is an example of that material support?
Pg. 20, #3: U.S., Saudi, and Egyptian political pressure on the Sudanese eventually forced them to expel Osama bin Laden in May 1996. Radical Afghan Sunni warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar, a strong Iranian ally, invited bin Laden to join him in Afghanistan. Hekmatyar and bin Laden had known each other during the 1980’s Afghan mujaheddin-Soviet war. Osama bin Laden then relocated to Afghanistan with the assistance of the Iranian intelligence services. Ex. 15, U.S. embassy (Islamabad) Cable, November 12, 1996; Ex. 7, Bergman Affid. 64; Ex. 2, Timmerman 2nd Affid. 99; see also 9/11 REPORT at pg. 65.

*The Saudis blame al Qaeda for the Khobar Tower attack that killed Americans. How was Iran involved in that attack?
Pg. 20, #4: The 9/11 Commission examined classified CIA documents establishing that IRGC-Qods Force commander Ahmad Vahidi planned the Khobar Towers attack with Ahmad al Mugassil, a Saudi-born al Qaeda operative. 9/11 REPORT, p. 60, n. 48. See Ex. 2, Timmerman 2nd Affid. 85-86.
A U.S. district court held that Iran was factually and legally responsible for the Khobar Towers bombing. Heiser v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 466 F. Supp. 2d 229 (D.D.C. 2006).

*Did Iran provide logistical support to al Qaeda, as to travel? Was Hizbullah part of that support? How?
Pg. 24, #5: The second way in which Iran furnished material and direct support for the 9/11 attacks was that a terrorist agent of Iran and Hizballah helped coordinate travel by future Saudi hijackers. As ­­­found by the 9/11 Commission, “[i]n October 2000, a senior operative of Hezbollah visited Saudi Arabia to coordinate activities there. He also planned to assist individuals in Saudi Arabia in traveling to Iran during November. A top Hezbollah commander and Saudi Hezbollah contacts were involved.” 9/11 REPORT at pg. 240.

*The Court connected the Lebanese Shiite Hizbullah to al-Qaeda. What role did Hizbullah play in the al Qaeda 9/11 attacks? What are the connections between the two groups that America calls terrorist organizations?

Pg. 25, #6: The actions of the “senior Hizballah operative,”Imad Mughniyah, and his “associate” and a “top commander” of Hizballah, in escorting 9/11 hijackers on flights to and from Iran, and coordinating passport and visa acquisition activities in Saudi Arabia also constituted direct and material support for the 9/11 conspiracy. 9/11 REPORT, pp. 240-41; Ex. 4, Kephart Affid. passin and specifically 3-5, 66, 70, 78; Ex. 6, Lopez-Tefft Affid. 104-07, 112-20, 264, 277; Ex. 3, Byman Affid. 32; 46-47, 49-50; Ex. 2, Timmerman 2nd Affid. 118-24; Ex. 7, Bergman Affid. 17; Ex. 8, Clawson Affid. 48-49, 59.

Link to the Havlish decision:  http://information.iran911case.com/Havlish_Findings_of_Fact_and_Conclusions_of_Law_Signed_12-22-11.pdf

* Forum and Link. 4/7/2016. www.forumandlink.com






          

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Response to Amer Zahr’s Sexual Harassment Column

-
Image
Rana Abbas, former ACRL executive director Amer Zahr, Rana Abbas's BFF Response to Amer Zahr’s Sexual Harassment Column The Imad Hamad saga has attracted a motley crew of individuals who joined in for two reasons: 1. To say, without any legal basis for personal knowledge, that the allegations are “true” for a variety of reasons.  2. To say that we basically need no investigation and that Imad should be fired because these two women have made these allegations. Allegation is the key word. Let’s look at the bright side of this sordid affair. Who knew that everyone in our community is a solid supporter of women’s rights? This is great! It really is. However, by God, people will prove it by piling on Imad Hamad before receiving all the facts. Let me make one thing clear. I am not stating these women were not harassed; nor am I stating they were. No one, other than Imad and the women, was in the room when the alleged harassment occurred.  No third party ...
Read more

The Palestinian-Israeli Conflict

-
The Lebanese secular al Safeer newspaper. The Lebanese leftist/ secular/communist Al Akhbar Both called the individual who attacked the Jewish religious school in Jerusalem a “shaheed” or martyr. When Arab seculars and communists, in addition to Islamists, call this person a martyr, it is further proof that the conflict is, not surprisingly, a political conflict between Jewish nationalism and Palestinian nationalism- not a religious conflict. Neither party in this conflict is respecting international law. It's a fact regardless of who has the big guns- and it's Israel who has the big guns here. Noncombatants continue to suffer.
Read more

The Lessons of the Wissam Allouche case: About lies, not terrorism

-
Image
Wissam Allouche arrested by the JTTF Flag of the Lebanese Shia Amal Movement The Lessons of the Wissam Allouche case: An American Lebanese Shiite Muslim caught in the government and media dog- and- pony show Wissam Allouche, a Lebanese Shia immigrant from Lebanon was sentenced to five years in prison for lying on his citizenship application and for lying to get a security clearance from the Department of Defense. The US government had asked for a ten- year sentence. Allouche’s criminal case began in 2013 and he was tried and convicted in 2015 in the Western District of Texas district court.  After conviction, the US Attorney for the Western district of Texas issued a press release that read in part: “Jurors found that defendant lied about his previous association with the Amal militia This afternoon in San Antonio, a federal jury convicted 45–year-old Lebanese–born Wissam “Sam” Allouche of knowingly lying to federal authorities on his U.S. citizenship p...
Read more