Interview with Imad Hamad, American Human Rights Council Executive Director
The American Human Rights Council (AHRC) is
holding its annual banquet on Thursday May 18. I interviewed Mr. Imad Hamad
with questions about the banquet and about AHRC. Below are excerpts.
Q: Another year, another banquet. What are the
highlights of this year’s banquet?
A: This year we are having our third banquet.
We are awarding remarkable individuals from diverse backgrounds for their work
advancing human rights. We expect a strong turnout, a full house- just like
last year. Last year we had over 800 attendees. This year we have
a special guest whose appearance is a great honor for the banquet.
Q: Human rights is a new type of advocacy in
Arab and Muslim circles, does this present a challenge to AHRC?
A: It used to present a serious challenge.
Before AHRC, I advocated for years for civil rights and civil liberties,
locally, nationally and internationally. Advocacy for civil rights and
liberties has been around for so many years that almost everyone understands
the concept and the work. Human rights advocacy in Arab and Muslim circles is
relatively new. When we started AHRC many people would ask me: What are human
rights? How are they different from civil rights and civil liberties? We don’t
get these questions anymore and I consider that a benchmark of
success. Human rights are largely God-given rights or natural rights
while civil rights are largely man-made rights. That’s a key distinction
here. Our goal at AHRC is to create a culture of awareness of and respect
for human rights. The fact that people know what we do and understand it is a
measure of our success.
Q: Do you still do civil rights work?
A: Yes, very often we have a case
where an individual would insist that we get involved and help them. It’s not
our primary goal but we don’t see a conflict- human rights are inclusive of
civil rights. We are selective in which cases we get involved in. One
constraint is capacity- our office is very small staffed. We have a high
success rates in our involvement in civil rights matters. Constructive
professional credible engagement is the key to our success. We have an open
door policy if we can’t help them, we direct them to where help could be
obtained.
Q: You are based in Dearborn. How would you
respond to someone saying that AHRC is yet another Dearborn organization added
to a myriad of others?
A: Our office is in Dearborn. We are part of
the Dearborn/Detroit organizational network. We are proud to be based in the
great city of Dearborn. But we are not a parochial organization- our focus
is local, national and global. Take our board for example and compare to
other organizations’ boards. Our board is impressive in its diversity and
talents. 90% of our board is outside Dearborn. Our awardees and banquet
attendees are also very diverse and not limited to Michigan.
Q: What are the biggest human rights challenges
of this year?
A: Syria and Yemen by far are the most
challenging. There are also ongoing crises in Palestine, Afghanistan and
Iraq. In addition to the domestic challenges that drastically increased
due to the new political era in the United States.
Q: How has the challenge of sectarianism
affected your work?
A: Sectarianism exists overseas and in the US
as well. It is a universal challenge. We stay true to our mission-
human rights. We advocate for human rights regardless of the identity of the
victim and the identity of the perpetrator. Human rights are about our
common humanity.
Q: Is funding an issue- What we hear from
secular activists is that there is strong religious giving in the Arab and
Muslim American community while secular organizations struggle. Is that still
true?
A: To a large extent yes. You always see new
religious centers being built and added. These institutions are
important. But what we don’t see the support needed to keep secular
organizations advancing missions that help everyone- including the religious. It
is relatively easy to get money to build a religious center or to dig a well or
feed the needy but harder to get contributions to secular organizations. We
advocate for everyone- we help everyone. Everyone should contribute.
Q: You have a prisoners’ rights program, how
does it work?
A: We advocate for the religious rights of
prisoners with the Michigan Department of Corrections- the Ramadan issue for
example. Muslim prisoners need to be accommodated as to meal time during the
month of fasting. We have succeeded in improving Michigan’s
accommodation of the fast of the inmates. This issue continues to be
a challenge and requires more work. We also partner with a great
Michigan based charity, Life for Relief and Development (LIFE), in providing
family gift to inmates. We complement the work of other organizations in this
area. What counts to us is helping people not the credit for it.
Q: You worked at one time on
government-community engagement. Are you still involved in that?
A: I still believe in the community-law
enforcement partnership model that provides a channel for dialogue that builds
trust- genuine dialogue and partnership. But take Detroit now. I was the
co-founder, along with the former US Attorney Jeff Collins, right after the
national tragedy of September 11 attacks, of BRIDGES. BRIDGES is a premier
law enforcement- community forum that I co-chaired until 2013. I was
invited nationally and internationally to speak about BRIDGES. Now, sadly, you
hear many are questioning the integrity of the process itself- it has lost its
inclusivity. Those who are allowed to participate in it are chosen on the basis
of who knows who and other ill- defined criteria. As a founder of
BRIDGES, I urge all, especially the government stakeholders, to
objectively reassess and evaluate the engagement process.
Q: What do you think needs to be done with
BRIDGES?
A: The value of engagement is measured by
keeping it an inclusive body that is not mandated or governed by parochial,
irrelevant to the forum, political agendas and limitations. This is a forum of
dialogue to all and it should include all the stakeholders- not only those who
are of politically convenient. These days this engagement is direly needed
given the many divisions we see and the challenges the community, the country
and indeed the whole world faces. Time is overdue to return it to its original
mission. BRIDGES is valuable and a model of community-law enforcement
engagement. It has to be restored to its old inclusive self. Otherwise, it is
perceived that the government stakeholders are taking sides in small community
politics and community rivalries that are irrelevant to the process. The
government stakeholders have to be careful not to be perceived as taking sides
in internal community disputes.
Q. The DHS Secretary visited Dearborn about a
month ago. What happened there?
A: That meeting was a good example of dialogue
done wrong. Key voices were excluded- it defeats the purpose. AHRC and others
were excluded from the meeting. This violates the letter and the spirit of
BRIDGES. Many people feel the same way. I feel I have an obligation to speak out on
this issue since I am a co-founder of BRIDGES.
Q: How is AHRC’s relationship with the media?
A: The media is crucial to our message and they
have been great. We have a great relationship. AHRC is often sought for comment
on matters related to human rights. I also write a guest column on human rights
matters in the Detroit News. Our voice is definitely heard.
Q. What challenges do you see for NGO work in
the Arab and Muslim American community?
A: There is a need for a strategic plan. There
is some progress but we still see that our work overall is reactive and crisis
driven. We need to respect specialization. We can’t all be doing everything at
the same time regardless of our mission. We should complement each other’s
work. The Muslim Ban issue brought us all on the same page, but what happens
after a crisis fades? We need a strategic plan.
Q: What are you thankful for?
A: The donors, the board, the supporters and
the volunteers. Our board consists of diverse talented people who are vital to
our success. The young interns we have are extraordinary and reassure us that
the future is promising.
Comments