Zionists and Jerusalem: Tactically flexible, strategically inflexible

-







On Jerusalem: Tactically flexible, strategically inflexible

Jerusalem is in the news. After an assault inside the Al-Aqsa Mosque Compound Sanctuary (al Aqsa), Israel responded with security measures that the Palestinians and Muslims worldwide condemned.  Thousands of Jerusalem Palestinians protested and refused to go through the metal detectors to pray inside the al Aqsa. They prayed outside it. Israel tried to crush their protests but failed. Finally, Israel relented and removed the security cameras and the metal detectors.


Why did Israel place the metal detectors? Why did it place the security cameras? It is incremental takeover of the Compound. The takeover process started with Jews asking for Muslim permission to pray at the Western Wall of al Aqsa. The Ottoman authorities, out of religious tolerance, allowed Jewish pilgrims to pray at the Borak Wall/the Western Wall. During the British Mandate, Zionists tried to expand this foothold at the wall. As a result, they unleashed the six-month Borak revolution/strike. The Palestinians knew that the Zionist movement, secular on the outside, had a religious aggression and a hostile takeover scheme at its core. They have been resisting the Zionist takeover of al Aqsa since then.

In 1967, Jordanian-controlled Jerusalem easily fell in the hands of the Israelis. As detailed in a recent Haaretz article, Israel moved quickly to create facts on the ground using all kinds of schemes to make the changes appear not central planning by the state. The Moroccan quarter that is adjacent to the Boraq Wall was destroyed and its residents forcefully thrown out. Those who refused to leave had their houses destroyed on them and on their personal property. In the Moroccan Quarter a Plaza was built, a de facto Jewish shrine. Another step toward takeover was taken in the fog of war.

Who witnessed these incremental takeover steps? Jerusalem Palestinians. Today, PM Netanyahu leads a coalition that includes Jewish religious zealots who want nothing in the world more than destroying al Aqsa and building a Temple in its place. There are open calls in Israel for destroying al Aqsa, the “abomination.” Israel uses all kinds of pretexts to move incrementally toward that goal. Avi Shlaim in Collusion Across the Jordan characterized Zionism as tactically flexible, strategically inflexible as to the goal of creating a Jewish state in Palestine. The same can be said about its al Aqsa designs. Being tactically flexible Israel backed down from the confrontation with the Jerusalem Palestinians over the cameras and the metal detectors. However, the strategic goal of taking over al Aqsa has not/ will not be abandoned by the international Zionist movement that controls the state of Israel.

The irony of it all? There is zero archaeological evidence that Solomon’s Temple stood where al Aqsa stands today.  Israel has been excavating under the Aqsa since 1967 and no physical evidence of a temple has ever been found. I asked an archaeology professor who worked in Palestine for decades about this and he said: “On the temple issue, we only have literary evidence.”




Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Mahr Enforceable in a Court of Law?

-
Image
Love Struck When I was in law school in Toledo, one of my classmates told me that when he married his Palestinian wife, on the wedding eve, the father of the bride made him sign a paper saying that he owes his wife $100,000 in the event of a divorce. The love struck young man was reluctant to sign it but could not protest given that that would have caused a lot of problems (a possible bridezilla outbreak?). He told me that now he knows that that paper has no value as a contract since if it did meet all the requirements of a valid contract as set by Ohio law and was executed under duress. It does not have to be this way. What is Mahr? It’s easy to say what it is not- It is not dower, not dowry and not bride price. Mahr is frequently misunderstood as dowry. It is not. It is not a bride’s price, and not dower. Dowry is assets (goods, money and real estate) that a wife brings to her new husband- it’s a common practice in India. It becomes the husband’s property. Bride pric
Read more

Response to Amer Zahr’s Sexual Harassment Column

-
Image
Rana Abbas, former ACRL executive director Amer Zahr, Rana Abbas's BFF Response to Amer Zahr’s Sexual Harassment Column The Imad Hamad saga has attracted a motley crew of individuals who joined in for two reasons: 1. To say, without any legal basis for personal knowledge, that the allegations are “true” for a variety of reasons.  2. To say that we basically need no investigation and that Imad should be fired because these two women have made these allegations. Allegation is the key word. Let’s look at the bright side of this sordid affair. Who knew that everyone in our community is a solid supporter of women’s rights? This is great! It really is. However, by God, people will prove it by piling on Imad Hamad before receiving all the facts. Let me make one thing clear. I am not stating these women were not harassed; nor am I stating they were. No one, other than Imad and the women, was in the room when the alleged harassment occurred.  No third party could
Read more

In Defense of the Dream During the Night of the Long Zionist Nightmare:

-
Image
    “When you were still swinging from trees, we had a state here.”   Former Israeli Prime Minister Naftali Bennet, speaking to an Arab member of Knesset.     Zionism is Jewish nationalism. Whether the Jews are a people or not, a nation or not, is for the Jews themselves to decide. For Arabs and Muslims, the issue of Zionism is not a theoretical issue. It is how the Zionist project has been carried out in Palestine. It is a settler colonial project that has been inflicting catastrophes on the indigenous people of Palestine. The indigenous people of Palestine include Muslims, Christians and Jews. The Zionist violence in the West Bank and Gaza is the most recent chapter in the settler colonial  book of horrors.    Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib got in trouble with some in the Jewish community for using the common, perfectly moral and just slogan "From the River to the Sea Palestine will be Free." This slogan captures a vision for Mandate Palestine and is a common slogan among the
Read more